Archive for Robin Hood

UK box office top-spot has been taken by Robin Hood, which means Iron Man 2 gets pushed down to second. With £5.75 compared to Iron Man 2′s £1.6m the new Robin Hood movie takes the lead!

BBC News write like this about it. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment_and_arts/10122471.stm)

Robin Hood’s latest big-screen outing has debuted at the top of the Ireland and UK box office, pushing Iron Man 2 into second place.

The Ridley Scott movie, which openedCannes Film Festival last week, took £5.75m to Iron Man’s £1.6m.

Horror remake A Nightmare on Elm Street stayed in third place with £0.65m, and Hot Tub Time Machine stayed in fourth with £0.57m.

Furry Vengeance dropped three places to round out the top five with £0.55m

Critical reaction to Robin Hood, starring Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, has been mixed.

This big-budget epic has taken a few liberties with the traditional outlaw story – Richard The Lionheart is portrayed as a selfish, warmongering monarch, while the Sheriff of Nottingham plays only a peripheral role.

It failed to topple Iron Man 2 from the North American box office last weekend.

Other films in the top 10 include Four Lions with £0.49m, and Jennifer Lopez’s latest film The Back Up Plan, which enjoyed till receipts of £0.48m.

How To Train Your Dragon and The Last Song both dropped a place, taking £0.24m and £0.18m respectively.

Date Night, starring Steve Carell and Tina Fey, was at number 10 with takings of £0.13m.

But for how long will Robin Hood remain in the top spot of the UK box office?

The totals of Iron Man 2′s 3 weeks add up to about £17.9m, which started with £7.6m it’s first week, which is £1.85 more than Robin Hood’s £5.75. With those numbers it seems hard for Robin Hood to take the UK box office lead in total takings.

Top 5 UK Box Office

  1. Robin Hood (£5.75m)
  2. Iron Man 2 (£1.60m)
  3. A Nightmare on Elm Street (£0.64m)
  4. Hot Tub Time Machine (£0.57m)
  5. Furry Vengeance (£0.54m)

Source of UK box office numbers: www.imdb.com

We’ll look forward on seeing how next week turns out for the new Robin Hood movie on the UK box office top list.

This is what Cate Blanchett revealed during a recent phone interview, which Bob Strauss writes about in his article for LA Daily News. (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/entertainment/stories.nsf/0/
49BCD3F04FDFD71D862577250005A131?OpenDocument)

LOS ANGELES — For centuries, girls throughout the English-speaking world have fantasized that they were Maid Marian getting rescued from damsel-in-distresshood by that dashing hero Robin Hood.

Cate Blanchett wasn’t one of them.

“I don’t know if all girls were like this, but I always dreamed about being Robin Hood,” the acclaimed Australian actress, who celebrates her 41st birthday today, revealed during a recent phone interview from England.

In the latest screen incarnation of the legendary bandit of Sherwood Forest, simply called “Robin Hood,” Blanchett sort of gets her wish. As the film’s more respectfully referred-to Lady Marion Loxley, we see her in the opening sequence firing flaming arrows at a pack of feral boys. She spends the middle portion of the movie sparring more than flirting with the returned Crusader Robin Longstride (Russell Crowe), who for various reasons must impersonate her long-gone (and recently deceased), knighted husband.

And by the movie’s climactic beach battle with an invasion force from France, well … we don’t want to spoil the plot, but how many leading ladies just sit demurely by in action movies these days?

Approached by co-star Crowe to join the project at a ceremony where several Aussie stars were being honored with postage stamps, Blanchett was soon eager to sign up for the fifth collaboration between Crowe and English director Ridley Scott (“Gladiator,” “A Good Year,” “American Gangster” and “Body of Lies” were the others).

“I liked what Ridley was interested in,” Blanchett said of the prequel-like take on the story, which emphasized contemporary concerns about government power and economic oppression implicit in Robin Hood’s “steal from the rich, give to the poor” ethos. “He’s a working-class guy from the North, so he’s always had a healthy disrespect for authority, and he feeds that into this.”

Even more to Blanchett’s liking, “Ridley wanted Marion to be her own woman rather than a damsel in distress — I suppose, closer to what the reality would have been like if the men had left the village to fight a long war. You don’t sit around weeping into your lace handkerchief; you get down and you start making day-to-day life bearable. You kill the animals, you till the land, you organize the micro-society.”

The classically stage-trained Blanchett has raised a few swords before — at the climax of her second film about Queen Elizabeth I, on occasion as the elf queen Galadriel in the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy — but Marion required a new set of supposed skills.

Agriculture is no easy task.

“There’s a beautiful, almost Dˆrer moment where I’m leading the plow and the horse — in clogs!” Blanchett laughed. “It was a challenge, but it’s acting. I think it was much harder for the guys who were doing day after day of combat in all that gear.”

For that very reason, “Robin Hood’s” numerous and elaborate combat scenes, several of which she participated in, gave Blanchett an appreciation of Scott’s people skills as well as his technical ones.

“Because Ridley is such an old hand, he knows how demanding it is and he doesn’t want people’s energy to flag,” she observed. “So he’ll choreograph this really long, complicated sequence, and then he’ll hide 17 cameras around so they’ll only have to do two or three takes.

“He’s like Spielberg in the sense that they both have, in the best way, ADD,” added Blanchett, who had a blast playing the sadistic Soviet nemesis in Steven Spielberg’s “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.” “If something’s not working, they’re not going to linger and try to make it work. They’ll cut out of that idea and, before they lose the light, do something else. Because they have such an incredible understanding of the medium, they can do that.”

As for working with the mercurial Crowe for the first time, Blanchett said it was a joy. And not just because he’s a fellow semi-Aussie (his folks were New Zealanders who moved to the continent when he was a boy; Cate’s father was an American who settled in Melbourne).

“I admired Russell and I’d met him at various places,” she explained. “So this was great. The wonderful thing about it is that, when you finally do work together, I’m so invested in the success of other Australian actors, the progress of their careers and the choices that they make. I think it’s because we’re a country the size of North America, but we’ve only got 20 million people, so you kind of have a proximity to what’s going in other peoples’ lives who are working in the same industry. I loved it.”

Blanchett spent more time on stage than on soundstages Down Under before the first “Elizabeth” movie rocketed her to international fame in 1998. After living primarily in England for a number of years, she and husband Andrew Upton returned to Australia to raise their two boys (which have since become three) closer to family. The couple were named co-directors of the Sydney Theatre Company in 2006; Liv Ullmann directed Blanchett as Blanche DuBois in “A Streetcar Named Desire” there last fall.

Filmmakers have generally viewed Blanchett as adept at just about anything. She won an Oscar for her portrayal of Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese’s “The Aviator,” and among her numerous nominations is one for playing, of all people, Bob Dylan in “I’m Not There.”

Artful and respectable as her filmography may be, Blanchett sure seems to dig taking part in big action movie franchises. (She said she has yet to be approached to reprise Galadriel in the upcoming “Hobbit” movies, though.) “Robin Hood” bears aspects of both endeavors, with its politicized portrait of a historical era and the story’s long lineage of having inspired signature adventure shows for nearly a century.

“Of course, there have been a lot of filmic renditions, all the way back to Douglas Fairbanks and up to Kevin Costner,” she said. “My sons are enamored with the modern costumed version that English television has at the moment. They’re all quite different, and one for every age.”

As for her own screen association with larger-than-life British figures, Blanchett is both unimpressed with herself and rather floored by how things have turned out.

“I suppose the ‘Elizabeth’ films put you into that category,” Blanchett said. “But you mix it up a bit by playing Bob Dylan, or I went back and made an Australian film a couple of years ago.

“But I’ve had an extraordinary set of experiences. And, look, I’m constantly surprised by it, absolutely.”

Robin Hood 2010 Trailer

Here comes the Official Trailer for the new Robin Hood movie! Enjoy!

Robin Hood Trailer

Apparently this is what Russel Crowe thinks the modern Robin Hood would be doing according to this article by Brian D. Johnson for Macleans. (http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/12/robin-hood-enemy-of-fox-news/)

They must have had a deal worked out. In the absence of Robin Hood director Ridley Scott, who was a no show in Cannes because of knee surgery, Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett were left holding the fort, explaining his movie for him at the press conference before the opening night premiere. The deal, by the sound of it, is that Crowe would do the explaining and Blanchett would play the movie star, looking dreamy (as always), and lightly flirting with her co-star. Crowe, a producer on the film, took charge, elaborating detail about the movie’s “version of history”— how “indolent egotist,” King John, is pressured into signing the first draft of the Magna Carta “and that to me is the fertile ground where a resistance fighter and rebel hero could rise up and apply that pressure. . .”

“With the love of a good woman,” Blanchett chips in.

Then Crowe made a crack about what trees in the forest are good for.

There were inevitable questions about retro-fitting the Robin Hood legend with politically correct contemporary references, notably an impassioned speech by Robin to Richard the Lionheart decrying a massacre of innocent Muslims by the crusaders. That made Crowe bristle, accusing the questioner of “making a grand assumption that people then had no empathy.” Touché. He went on to say that “there’s an element of Robin Hood lying in the heart of all of us.”

Then, asked what Robin Hood would be doing today, he said: “I’ve been asked this question a lot. Would Robin Hood’s aim be political? Would it be economic? Would he be looking at Wall Street and the huge sums of money that people would be patting themselves on the back with, and the sub-prime mortgage collapse and all that? Or would he be looking what you guys are do for a living and realize that the truth wealth lies in the dissemination of information. My theory would be, if Robin Hood was alive today, that he would be looking at the monopolization of media as the greatest enemy.”

Well, doesn’t that sound like fun—firing flaming arrows at Fox News.

Crowe said the history was just a point of entry. “You have to do enough – just enough accurate history to pique people’s curiosity,” he says. “The main shift that we made, if you want a revolutionary shift, is Richard the Lionheart rides in and we kill him in the first scene. That signals to anyone who’s a fan of previous Robin Hoods that it’s a different game.”

And later, when pushed about the ratio of historical fact to fiction, Russell basically threw in the towel: “Apart from the year and a couple of names, we made it all up.” As for the prospect of a franchise, and a long-term commitment by him and Blanchett—that was my question to both of them—Crowe said, “Obviously there’s a bigger story to be told. There’s no grand planning. But if we do get the opportunity to do it again, with Ridley and Cate. . . I think the cool thing about the relationship between Robin and Marian is that there’s a very adult moment there. They come to each other slowly. And we still haven’t seen the love scene in the forest, the dappled light coming through the trees. . .”

Blanchett’s retort was drowned out by laughter. When I asked her about how far she would like to this merry woodland romance, she played coy: “I haven’t been asked.”

Perhaps there’s some truth in the media statment. But wouldn’t there be bigger fish for the Modern Robin Hood to fry?

nurse aide license Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyers